Decision making process for construction projects
Typically, the client will be the ultimate decision maker on construction projects, as they will generally have instigated and will be paying for the project and are likely to have a long-term interest in it after the design and construction process has been completed.
However, the client is rarely a single person, even on relatively small projects and the client organisation is likely include a number of groups or individuals with an interest in, responsibility for or control over the project.
Depending on the complexity and size of the project, and whether the client is in the public or private sector, the levels of decision makers within the client organisation might be structured as follows:
- Main board of directors / Investment decision maker
- Project director / Senior responsible owner
- Board representative / Project sponsor
- Project board.
- User panels.
- Champions.
- Project managers
For more information see: Client.
However, there may be other parties with an interest in the project that may be involved in the decision-making process. This might include:
- Funders and shareholders.
- Insurers.
- The local authority.
- Other statutory authorities and non-statutory consultees.
- The emergency services.
- User groups.
For more information see: Stakeholders and Third-party dependencies.
These parties may not all have the same objectives or views and so it is important that a clear management strategy is in place to ensure that the right information is available at the right time to ensure the right people are able to make the right decisions. Building information modelling is seen as one of the tools that can help ensure this happens. For more information see: Building information modelling.
Typically the decision making process itself will involve passing through a number of key decision points, or gateways, at which the client assesses the state of development of the project and considers; whether it satisfies their strategic objectives, that it is affordable, that value is being delivered, and that risks are acceptable. They can then decide whether to progress to the next stage.
Allowing the client to make decision about whether to proceed at gateways requires the preparation and submission of relevant information by the consultant team, contractors and other suppliers. Decisions may also involve expert assessment and advice from client representatives, independent client advisers, project managers, or even external bodies (such as external design reviews).
It is possible that the client will decide not to proceed, or will ask for further work to be carried out, whether this is revision of the design, or undertaking value management exercises to re-align proposals with the available budget.
Decisions to proceed may be accompanied by the introduction of change control procedures, freezing certain aspects of the project. This ensures that approved parts of the project are not changed without the express permission of the client.
For more information see: Gateways and change control.
An detailed description off the process for securing information and making decision for a number of different procurement routes is available at: Project plans.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki.
Featured articles and news
What they are, how they work and why they are popular in many countries.
Plastic, recycling and its symbol
Student competition winning, M.C.Esher inspired Möbius strip design symbolising continuity within a finite entity.
Do you take the lead in a circular construction economy?
Help us develop and expand this wiki as a resource for academia and industry alike.
Warm Homes Plan Workforce Taskforce
Risks of undermining UK’s energy transition due to lack of electrotechnical industry representation, says ECA.
Cost Optimal Domestic Electrification CODE
Modelling retrofits only on costs that directly impact the consumer: upfront cost of equipment, energy costs and maintenance costs.
The Warm Homes Plan details released
What's new and what is not, with industry reactions.
Could AI and VR cause an increase the value of heritage?
The Orange book: 2026 Amendment 4 to BS 7671:2018
ECA welcomes IET and BSI content sign off.
How neural technologies could transform the design future
Enhancing legacy parametric engines, offering novel ways to explore solutions and generate geometry.
Key AI related terms to be aware of
With explanations from the UK government and other bodies.
From QS to further education teacher
Applying real world skills with the next generation.
A guide on how children can use LEGO to mirror real engineering processes.
Data infrastructure for next-generation materials science
Research Data Express to automate data processing and create AI-ready datasets for materials research.
Wired for the Future with ECA; powering skills and progress
ECA South Wales Business Day 2025, a day to remember.
AI for the conservation professional
A level of sophistication previously reserved for science fiction.
Biomass harvested in cycles of less than ten years.
An interview with the new CIAT President
Usman Yaqub BSc (Hons) PCIAT MFPWS.
Cost benefit model report of building safety regime in Wales
Proposed policy option costs for design and construction stage of the new building safety regime in Wales.
Do you receive our free biweekly newsletter?
If not you can sign up to receive it in your mailbox here.
























